<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vistapages Review &#38; Vistapages Coupon $15 - Vistapages Hosted &#187; Vistapages Uptime</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages/vistapages-uptime/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vistapages-review.org</link>
	<description>Vistapages reviews and vistapages coupons. Read vistapages user reviews before signup vistapages.com hosting. Vistapages coupon and vistapages discount code offering $15 dollars discount. Vista pages reviews from forums, blogs, and user submitted. This vistapages blog is also about vistapages coupon, vistapage discount, vistapages rebate, and vistapages promotion.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:45:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Vistapages uptime &amp; Vistapages review for September 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-review-for-september-2009</link>
		<comments>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-review-for-september-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 03:45:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vistapages Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistapages-review.org/?p=102</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vistapages uptime by Vistapages-review.org for September 2009: 98.914% over the internet Vistapages uptime for this month is quit similar with last month 98.6% over the internet. 8 Downtime for this month, and a major downtime at 7th september, and 24th september. Everage days are fine, lots of perfect uptime days. Just we are quit worry [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vistapages uptime by Vistapages-review.org for September 2009</strong>: 98.914% over the internet</p>
<p>Vistapages uptime for this month is quit similar with last month 98.6% over the internet. 8 Downtime for this month, and a major downtime at 7th september, and 24th september. Everage days are fine, lots of perfect uptime days. Just we are quit worry for the major downtime, its twice for this month.</p>
<p>This vistapages review site also serve as hostmds review site, as vistapages is arlready acquired by hostmds. The vistapages uptime here reflect the same uptime for hostmds hosting.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages.php"><img class="aligncenter" title="Vistapages uptime review" src="../images/vistapages-uptime-review-september-2009.gif" alt="" width="608" height="742" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-review-for-september-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vistapages uptime &amp; Vistapages review for August 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-review-for-august-2009</link>
		<comments>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-review-for-august-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 11:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vistapages Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistapages-review.org/?p=100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vistapages uptime by Vistapages-review.org for August 2009: 98.626% over the internet Vistapages uptime: here is another month of poor service uptime, 98.6% over the internet. And 7 downtime outages this month, major downtime on 3rd august&#8230; it last over 8 hours long. The vistapages web server are down for 8 hours long.. thats a very [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vistapages uptime by Vistapages-review.org for August 2009</strong>: 98.626% over the internet</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages/vistapages-uptime"><strong>Vistapages uptime</strong></a>: here is another month of poor service uptime, 98.6% over the internet. And 7 downtime outages this month, major downtime on 3rd august&#8230; it last over 8 hours long. The vistapages web server are down for 8 hours long.. thats a very long downtime.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/"><strong>Vistapages review</strong></a>: Currently <a href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages/vistapages-hosting"><strong>vistapages hosting</strong></a> are promoting their dedicated servers, and its from amazingly low $7.99 per month only. This vistapages review site had recorded some poor service uptime for the recent few months, its not promosing&#8230; we are expecting the problem to be resolved soon.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages.php"><img class="aligncenter" title="Vistapages uptime review" src="../images/vistapages-uptime-review-august-2009.gif" alt="" width="583" height="1026" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-review-for-august-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vistapages uptime &amp; Vistapages review for July 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-review-for-july-2009</link>
		<comments>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-review-for-july-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:43:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vistapages Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistapages-review.org/?p=89</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vistapages uptime by Vistapages-review.org for July 2009: 98.174% over the internet Vistapages review and vistapages uptime can be found here int his web hosting blog. Vistapages hosting is already part of hostmds hosting since few month back. And for this month service uptime, we are getting just 98.1% over the internet. 52 downtime incident and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vistapages uptime by Vistapages-review.org for July 2009</strong>: 98.174% over the internet</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/">Vistapages review</a> and vistapages uptime can be found here int his web hosting blog. <a href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages/vistapages-hosting">Vistapages hosting</a> is already part of hostmds hosting since few month back. And for this month service uptime, we are getting just 98.1% over the internet. 52 downtime incident and few major downtime recorded throughout the month. Vistapages uptime for this month is very low, much lower than the <a href="http://www.topwebhostingreviews.org/">top web hosting</a> companies like <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self">bluehost</a>, <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self">hostmonster</a>, <a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self">hostgator</a>, <a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self">ixwebhosting</a>, <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self">fatcow</a>, <a href="http://www.justhostreviews.org/" target="_self">justhost</a>, <a href="http://www.midphasereview.org/" target="_self">midphase</a>, <a href="http://www.ipowerwebreview.org/" target="_self">ipower</a> and others.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Vistapages Uptime" src="../images/vistapages-uptime-july-2009.gif" alt="" width="583" height="846" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-review-for-july-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vistapages uptime and Vistapages Review for June 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-and-vistapages-review-for-june-2009</link>
		<comments>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-and-vistapages-review-for-june-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2009 23:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vistapages Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistapages-review.org/?p=85</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vistapages uptime by Vistapages-review.org for June 2009: 99.265% over the internet Vistapages uptime for this month is very low, at only 99.2% over the internet, and major downtime happened at 4th july 2009. Vistapages is now own by hostmds, and we are so far not happy with their service uptime and server quality. 0.8% downtime [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vistapages uptime by Vistapages-review.org for June 2009:</strong> 99.265% over the internet</p>
<p>Vistapages uptime for this month is very low, at only 99.2% over the internet, and major downtime happened at 4th july 2009. Vistapages is now own by hostmds, and we are so far not happy with their service uptime and server quality. 0.8% downtime is too much and not acceptable. Due to this, the vistapages ranking in <a href="http://www.topwebhostingreviews.org/" target="_self">Topwebhostingreviews.org</a> will fall and no longer maintain a good ranking in the chart of <a href="http://www.topwebhostingreviews.org/" target="_self">top web hosting</a> companies. For this month; <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self">bluehost</a>, <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self">hostmonster</a>, <a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self">hostgator</a>, <a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self">ixwebhosting</a>, <a href="http://www.midphasereview.org/" target="_self">midphase</a>, <a href="http://www.ipowerwebreview.org/" target="_self">ipower</a> are on the top of the list.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Vistapages Uptime" src="../images/vistapages-uptime-june-2009.gif" alt="" width="580" height="849" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-and-vistapages-review-for-june-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vistapages uptime &amp; Vistapages Reviews for April 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-reviews-for-april-2009</link>
		<comments>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-reviews-for-april-2009#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2009 00:21:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vistapages Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistapages-review.org/?p=80</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vistapages uptime by www.Vistapages-review.org for April 2009: 92.327% over the internet Vistapages uptime for this month is worst. Previous month uptime was 99.7% which is just fine. But for this april, the vistpages uptime fall to just 92% over the internet. There were over 3000 minutes of server downtime. This is too much downtime for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vistapages uptime by www.Vistapages-review.org for April 2009:</strong> 92.327% over the internet</p>
<p><a href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/">Vistapages</a> uptime for this month is worst. Previous month uptime was 99.7% which is just fine. But for this april, the vistpages uptime fall to just 92% over the internet. There were over 3000 minutes of server downtime. This is too much downtime for any web hosting plan.</p>
<p>View other <a class="kblinker" title="More about top web hosting »" href="http://www.topwebhostingreviews.org/">top hosting</a> like <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>bluehost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostgator</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostmonster</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ixwebhosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fatcow</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>a2hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.lunarpagesreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>lunarpages</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.anhostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>anhosting</strong></a>, <strong><a href="http://www.midphasereview.org/">midphase</a></strong> etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Vistapages Uptime" src="../images/vistapages-uptime-april-2009.gif" alt="" width="585" height="680" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-vistapages-reviews-for-april-2009/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vistapages uptime for march 2009 &#8211; www.vistapages-review.org</title>
		<link>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-march-2009-wwwvistapages-revieworg</link>
		<comments>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-march-2009-wwwvistapages-revieworg#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vistapages Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistapages-review.org/?p=78</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vistapages uptime for march 2009 : 99.728% over the internet. Source provided by www.vistapages-review.org Another month of below 99.9% uptime by vistapges hosting, this month is with 11 downtime and more than 100 minutes of downtime. Vistapages uptime was 99.7% over the internet. More web hosting review site and web hosting coupon site at hostmonster, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vistapages uptime for march 2009 :</strong> 99.728% over the internet. Source provided by www.vistapages-review.org</p>
<p>Another month of below 99.9% uptime by vistapges hosting, this month is with 11 downtime and more than 100 minutes of downtime. Vistapages uptime was 99.7% over the internet.</p>
<p>More web hosting review site and web hosting coupon site at <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostmonster</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>bluehost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostgator</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fatcow</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ix web hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.webhostingpadreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>webhostingpad</strong></a>, <strong><a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>a2hosting</strong></a></strong>, <a href="http://www.startlogicreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>startlogic</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.liquidwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>liquidweb</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fastdomainreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fastdomain</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong></strong></a><a href="http://www.dot5hostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>dot5 hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ipowerwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ipowerweb</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.lunarpagesreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>lunarpages</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.eukhostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>eukhost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.site5review.org/" target="_self"><strong>site5</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.powwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>powweb</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.midphasereview.org/" target="_self"><strong>midphase</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostexcellencereview.org/" target="_self"><strong>host excellence</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong></strong></a><strong><a href="http://www.fastdomainreview.org/" target="_self">fastdomain</a></strong>,  <a href="http://www.cirtexhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>cirtex hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.anhostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>AN Hosting</strong></a> etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Vistapages Uptime" href="http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Vistapagee uptime" src="../images/vistapages-uptime-march-2009.gif" alt="" width="579" height="689" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-march-2009-wwwvistapages-revieworg/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vistapages uptime for january 2009 &#8211; www.vistapages-review.org</title>
		<link>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-january-2009-wwwvistapages-revieworg</link>
		<comments>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-january-2009-wwwvistapages-revieworg#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 02:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vistapages Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistapages-review.org/?p=75</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vistapages uptime for january 2009: 99.322% over the Internet. Source by www.vistapages-review.org Vistapages service uptime is lower this month, only 99.3% over the internet. With 25 downtime occurance and up to 300 minutes of service downtime recorded. There server response time is slow as well, at only 0.42 second in average.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vistapages uptime for january 2009:</strong> 99.322% over the Internet. Source by www.vistapages-review.org</p>
<p>Vistapages service uptime is lower this month, only 99.3% over the internet. With 25 downtime occurance and up to 300 minutes of service downtime recorded. There server response time is slow as well, at only 0.42 second in average.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="../vistapages.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Vistapages uptime" src="../images/vistapages-uptime-january-2009.gif" alt="" width="584" height="689" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-january-2009-wwwvistapages-revieworg/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vistapages uptime for december 2008 &#8211; www.vistapages-review.org</title>
		<link>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-december-2008-wwwvistapages-revieworg</link>
		<comments>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-december-2008-wwwvistapages-revieworg#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2009 18:40:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vistapages Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistapages-review.org/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vistapages uptime for december 2008: 98.579% over the internet. Source by www.vistapages-review.org Vistapages hosting uptime for this december is very poor, recording at only 98.5% over the internet. With 25 downtime occurance, and more than 600 minutes of downtime. Server response time is average, at 0.4 second in average. Compare vistapages hosting with other web [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vistapages uptime for december 2008:</strong> 98.579% over the internet. Source by <strong style="color: black; background-color: #ffff66;">www.vistapages-review.org</strong></p>
<p><a class="kblinker" title="More about vistapages hosting »" href="../">Vistapages hosting</a> uptime for this december is very poor, recording at only 98.5% over the internet. With 25 downtime occurance, and more than 600 minutes of downtime. Server response time is average, at 0.4 second in average.</p>
<p>Compare vistapages hosting with other web hosting company &amp; hosting package: <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostmonster</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>bluehost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostgator</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.webhostingpadreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>webhostingpad</strong></a>, <strong><a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>a2hosting</strong></a></strong>, <a href="http://www.startlogicreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>startlogic</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.liquidwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>liquidweb</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fastdomainreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fastdomain</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fatcow</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.dot5hostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>dot5 hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ipowerwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ipowerweb</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ix web hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.lunarpagesreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>lunarpages</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.eukhostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>eukhost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong></strong></a><strong><a href="http://www.fastdomainreview.org/" target="_self">fastdomain</a></strong>, <a href="http://www.site5review.org/" target="_self"><strong>site5</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.powwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>powweb</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.midphasereview.org/" target="_self"><strong>midphase</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostexcellencereview.org/" target="_self"><strong>host excellence</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.cirtexhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>cirtex hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.anhostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>AN Hosting</strong></a> etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Vistapages Uptime" href="../vistapages.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Vistapages Uptime" src="../images/vistapages-uptime-december-2008.gif" alt="" width="585" height="692" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-december-2008-wwwvistapages-revieworg/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vistapages uptime for november 2008 &#8211; www.vistapages-review.org</title>
		<link>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-november-2008-wwwvistapages-revieworg</link>
		<comments>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-november-2008-wwwvistapages-revieworg#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Dec 2008 18:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vistapages Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Problem]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistapages-review.org/?p=39</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vistapages uptime for november 2008: 93.349% over the Internet. Source by www.vistapages-review.org Once again, we are recording a poor service uptime with vistapages shared hosting plan. Fact is that, previously we seen 97% uptime, and now it is getting worst with 93% uptime only. There were more than 53 times of server downtime, and 569 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vistapages uptime for november 2008:</strong> 93.349% over the Internet. Source by www.vistapages-review.org</p>
<p>Once again, we are recording a poor <a class="kblinker" title="More about service uptime »" href="http://www.serviceuptime.com/?aff=35TD" target="_blank">service uptime</a> with vistapages shared hosting plan. Fact is that, previously we seen 97% uptime, and now it is getting worst with 93% uptime only. There were more than 53 times of server downtime, and 569 failed checks. Thats lots of server problem and downtime. Server response averagely slow at 0.357 second in average.</p>
<p>Compare <a class="kblinker" title="More about vistapages hosting »" href="../">vistapages hosting</a> with other web hosting plan from <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>blue host</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ix web hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fatcow</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>host gator</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.webhostingpadreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>web hosting pad</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostmonster</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.lunarpagesreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>lunarpages</strong></a>,  <strong><a href="http://www.fastdomainreview.org/" target="_self">fastdomain</a></strong>, <a href="http://www.powwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>pow web</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.dot5hostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>dot5hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.site5review.org/" target="_self"><strong>site5</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ipowerwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ipower</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.eukhostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong></strong></a><a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>a2hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.cirtexhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>cirtex hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.eukhostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>eukhost</strong></a> etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Vistapages Uptime" href="../vistapages.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Vistapages Uptime" src="../images/vistapages-uptime-november-2008.gif" alt="" width="587" height="719" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-november-2008-wwwvistapages-revieworg/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vistapages uptime for october 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-october-2008</link>
		<comments>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-october-2008#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 18:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vistapages Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Vistapages Uptime]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vistapages-review.org/?p=41</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vistapages uptime for october 2008: 97.908% over the Internet For the first time, vistapages uptime statistic is posted in this vistapages review blog. From statistic, it shows that vistapages uptime is bit low, only recording a 97.9% of service uptime. With more than 29 service failure detected over the month, and with major downtime on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Vistapages uptime for october 2008</strong>: 97.908% over the Internet</p>
<p>For the first time, vistapages uptime statistic is posted in this vistapages review blog. From statistic, it shows that vistapages uptime is bit low, only recording a 97.9% of <a class="kblinker" title="More about service uptime »" href="http://www.serviceuptime.com/?aff=35TD" target="_blank">service uptime</a>. With more than 29 service failure detected over the month, and with major downtime on 10th &amp; 11th of the month.</p>
<p>The vistapages server response time is average only. recording average of 0.346 second only.</p>
<p>Compare vistapages hosting with other web hosting provider like: <a href="http://www.hostmonsterreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostmonster</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.hostgatorreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>hostgator</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>fatcow</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.bluehostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>bluehost</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.fatcowreview.org/" target="_self"><strong></strong></a><a href="http://www.ixwebhostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ix web hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.webhostingpadreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>webhostingpad</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.startlogicreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>startlogic</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.site5review.org/" target="_self"><strong>site 5</strong></a>,     <a href="http://www.lunarpagesreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>lunarpages</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>a2hosting</strong></a>, <strong><a href="http://www.fastdomainreview.org/" target="_self">fastdomain</a></strong>, <a href="http://www.powwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>powweb</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.dot5hostingreviews.org/" target="_self"><strong>dot5hosting</strong></a>, <a href="http://www.ipowerwebreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>ipower</strong></a>,  <a href="http://www.eukhostreview.org/" target="_self"><strong>eukhost</strong></a> <a href="http://www.a2hostingreview.org/" target="_self"><strong></strong></a>etc.</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a title="Vistapages Uptime" href="../vistapages.php" target="_self"><img class="aligncenter" title="Vistapages Uptime" src="../images/vistapages-uptime-october-2008.gif" alt="" width="587" height="695" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vistapages-review.org/vistapages-uptime-for-october-2008/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
